The project file existed to persist state, so a future reader finding
the exported flag would otherwise re-litigate it. The ADR states plainly
that this reverses an earlier decision, what the original reasoning was,
and what changed in use.
ADR 0002 deferred the SVG renderer partly because re-export made it free
to add later. That no longer holds, so its 'not stranded' bullet is
struck through and pointed at ADR 0007 rather than left standing to
mislead whoever revisits the SVG question.
The handoff was written as a message to relay information; several
decisions lived only there. Split into permanent homes:
- docs/spec.md — scope, geometry model, pipeline order, detection,
levels, editor, project file, markers, bundle format, noteman's
changes, reference values
- ADR 0002 — raster only in release 1; SVG slices measured at 40x WebP
naive, 2.6x with a bounding-box cull, deferred on risk not size
- ADR 0003 — lossless WebP with levels and 16-level alpha; every lossy
option and alternative format measured larger for line art
- ADR 0004 — detection proposes, the human disposes; no unattended mode
- ADR 0005 — PyMuPDF for all PDF access, accepting AGPL
- ADR 0006 — systems are found by vertical brackets, not row-darkness
gaps, which miscount every page of a 6-voice score
Also from testing against the hardest score in the repertoire: scanned
PDFs carry their scan as an embedded image and must be extracted at
native resolution rather than re-rendered at 600 DPI, and per-page
deskew is mandatory (skew varies -2.6 to +1.2 within one PDF).
Records the outcome of the design review that reworked the original
handoff notes:
- CONTEXT.md — ubiquitous language for the slicer (slice, cut, discard,
content rectangle, trim, song scale, bundle, project, jump source)
- docs/adr/0001 — the slicer owns all image processing and the bundle is
the only channel to noteman; noteman's sharp pipeline goes away
- pyproject renamed to noteman-slicer
- .gitignore keeps scores and bundles out of the repo (copyright, size)
Esa Kataja