Ask before reopening a bundle that carries no cuts

A bundle without a source block cannot be round-tripped, but its PDF can
still be cut from scratch. Offer that instead of refusing: confirm, run
detection, and line the markers up by position when the slice counts
match exactly.
This commit is contained in:
Esa Kataja
2026-07-29 15:06:45 +03:00
parent 61b8ec8301
commit cdf37302d7
5 changed files with 223 additions and 66 deletions
+8
View File
@@ -228,6 +228,14 @@ The archived document is the source of truth for reopening: the slice images are
output, and a consumer that reopens a bundle re-renders them rather than
importing them.
`source` is optional, so a bundle without one is still valid — it is simply not
reopenable, and a consumer should say so rather than pretend otherwise. What it
can still recover from such a bundle is the title block, and, if it cuts the
document again and happens to find exactly as many slices, the markers: the
slices array is in reading order, so it lines up with any other list in reading
order. One slice more or fewer and it does not, which is why that is a fallback
and not the design.
## Engraving
Most slices are photographs of print: an image and nothing more. A slice that